POCELE SU IGRE PROTIV BECIROVICA; INTERNACIONALNI GLASNIK

POKRET ZA REPUBLIKU BOSNU I HERCEGOVINU; Glasnik Nacionalnog kongresa Republike BiH - br. 963 4. februar 2018. SADRZAJ 1. Zbog Vojina Mijatovic u SDP-u razmatraju sankcije protiv Denisa Becirovica 2. POCELE SU IGRE PROTIV BECIROVICA 3. I SEPIC JE NA NISANU VELIKOSRPSKIH MEDIJA 4. Online Glasnik na Engleskom, No. 962 ONLINE NEWSLETTER International, No. 962 1. Council of Europe urges Bosnia to reform constitution, election law ahead of October vote 2. COUNCIL OF EUROPE DISCRIMINATES SOME BOSNIANS WHILE PREACHING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF SOME OTHER BOSNIANS ──────────── 1. Zbog Vojina Mijatovic u SDP-u razmatraju sankcije protiv Denisa Becirovica Vojin Mijatovic, potpredsjednik Glavnog odbora Socijaldemokratske partije BiH (SDP), nedavno je podigao prašinu u javnosti svojim izjavama o 9. januaru, takozvanom danu RS-a te izjavom da se o "danu BiH trebamo dogovoriti". Dok ga je SDP branio u svom saopcenju, ta stranka je istovremeno odbila objaviti otvoreno pismo Denisa Becirovica, potpredsjednika SDP-a i državnog zastupnika, na svojoj web stranici i poslati ga medijima u formi saopcenja. 600_1517503212vojin-denis Kako su Faktoru rekli neki od clanova SDP-a, nakon što je Becirovic otvoreno pismo u kojem nije direktno spominjao Mijatovica, ali je svima bilo jasno na šta se referira, objavio na svojoj Facebook stranici, uslijedile su kritike na njegov racun unutar stranke, a moguce je da mu budu izrecene i sankcije. Becirovic je javnosti poznat po isticanju svojih stavova o 9. januaru te po inicijativama koje je upucivao u Parlamentu BiH gdje je tražio, izmedu ostalog, usvajanje zakona o zabrani negiranja genocida i drugih zlocina. Kako je SDP "spustio loptu" te se pokušava pozicionirati u RS-u ili pomoci SNSD-u da se domogne Predsjedništva BiH, za šta ih se u javnosti proziva, Becirovicevi stavovi su ocito postali problematicni za tu stranku. Nakon sastanka koji je delegacija SDP-a predvodena Nerminom Nikšicem imala u Banjoj Luci sa Miloradom Dodikom, u medijima su se pojavile informacije da je cak i Dodik tražio od rukovodstva SDP-a da "discipliniraju" Becirovica na nacin da ublaži svoju retoriku spram entiteta Republika Srpska i ratnih zlocina. U SDP-u su navodno s Becirovicem o tome i razgovarali, ali on ocito nije ustuknuo pred njihovim zahtjevima. Unutarstranacke trzavice, bar kako sada stvari stoje, Becirovicu ne idu u prilog u smislu pozicioniranja na narednim Opcim izborima. Bez sumnje, Becirovic se vidi kao kandidat za bošnjackog clana Predsjedništva BiH, a mišljenja o eventualnoj kandidaturi su unutar stranke podijeljena. S druge strane, spominje se sve izvjesnijom mogucnost da SDP kandiduje Vojina Mijatovica za predsjednika RS-a, a Draška Acimovica za clana Predsjedništva BiH iz reda srpskog naroda. (Bportal/Faktor) ──────────── 2. POCELE SU IGRE PROTIV BECIROVICA Pise: Muhamed Borogovac Sudeci prema pisanju BiH stampe od 1. februara, 2018, "Zbog Vojina Mijatovic u SDP-u razmatraju sankcije protiv Denisa Becirovica" i to u kljucnom momentu za Becirovica, kada mu je podrska stranke najpotrebnija, kada upravo njega svi gradjanski orijentisani glasaci u BiH vide kao glavnog njihovog kandidata za bosnjackog clana Predsjednistva BiH, buduci da je on vec dugo najpopularniji politicar SDP-a, zahvaljujuci njegovom neskrivenom patriotizmu. Znaci i SDP je i dalje pod kontrolom velikosrpskog projekta isto kao i SDA. Nastavlja se stara igra, jos iz vremena Alije i Lagumdzije, koja se igra ovako: Oni koji su na vlasti, u ovome trenutku SDA, otvoreno izdaju drzavu, a oni koji su u opoziciji skupljaju poene za slijedece izbore patriotskim inicijativama, ali koje se uvijek nekako izjalove, kao npr. nedavno SDP-DF-ov prijedlog Izbornog zakona. Medjutim tamo gdje bi SDP mogao uspjeti, npr. da kandiduju Becirovica za Bosnjackog clana predsjednistva, i gdje im SDA ne moze pokvariti posao, e tu se pojavi nesto drugo unutar SDP-a i opet corak. Sa druge strane, sjetimo se da je Lagumdzijina i Silajdziceva Alijansa za promjene usvojila Izborni zakon kojim se Bosna i Hercegovina dijeli u dvije izborne jedinice, cime je RS dobila jedan veliki atribut drzavnosti. Alijansa je dala dvojno drzavljanstvo izbjeglim Srbima u Srbiji i time omogucila blokiranje dvojnog drzavljanstva Bosnjacima u drugim drzavama svijeta. Dok je bio na vlasti, SDP je pocinio jes mnoge zlocine, dok je tada Tihiceva SDA glumila patriotizam, skupljajuci glasove za vracanje na vlast, gde ce pociniti nove izdaje, i tako sve ukrug. To je zato sto velikosrpski projekat ne moze dozvoliti da za bosnjackog clana predsjednistva dodje neko koga taj projekat ne kontrolise. Oni su u stanju ubiti ljude koji bi im mogli stati na put velikoj Srbiji, kao sto su ubili ili uklonili Dzemala Bijedica, Hamdiju Pozderca, Dr. Fuada Muhica, Hakiju Turjalica, Irfana Ljubljenkica i jos mnogo vise heroja odbrane, koji su im smetali da na lokalnim nivoima uspostave potpunu kontorlu izajnicke vlasti. Nadajmo se da Becirovic ima dovoljno podrske clanstva SDP-a, i da ce znati organizovati tu podrsku da postane kandidat za predsjednistvo. U SVAKOM SLUCAJU SE TREBA KANDIDOVATI, sa SDP-om ili bez SDP-a. Istina, ni to mu ne garantuje da ce biti izabran, jer velkosrpski projekat ce preko, SDA ako ikako moze blokirati i izbore, onako kako su blokirani u Mostaru. A kada kazem "velikosrpski projekat" tu prije svega mislim na srpske agente medju laznim Bosnjacima, u SDA, u SDP, u SBB, ... oni su okosnica toga projekta, oni nas znaju i sabotiraju iznutra. Lako bi mi sa Srbima i Hrvatima izasli na kraj da nije te izdajncke gube. Mijatovic je tu ubacen samo kao pokrice, da "glupi Bosanci" nastave da krive Srbe, za sve, da oni sakriju svoju pravu prirodu posrbica asimilaranih u srpstvo za vrijeme njihove "Juge". Oni se nalaze u svim strankama, ali imaju isti projekat, rasturanje Bosne i Herceogvine. Oni su naslijedili organizaciju i profesionalizam Udbe. Ako bi npr. Jerlagic od SBiH napravio znacajnu stranku, velikosrpski projekat bi ponovo doveo Siladzica na calo SBB. Naprosto, velkosrpski projekat ne smije dozvoliti da istinski patrioti uzmu vlast medju Bosnjacima. Trebamo to imati uvijek na umu, prepoznavati licemjere medju nama, da bi im se znali suprotstaviti u svakoj konkretnoj situaciji. ──────────── 3. I SEPIC JE NA NISANU VELIKOSRPSKIH MEDIJA Od ostalih znacajnih vijesti, spomenimo samo da je Dino Konakovic napustio SDA. Zaista je dobra stvar je sto postoji Nezavisni blok, i sto Sepic rado prihvata sve disidente iz SDA. To je i logicno, jer najkarakterniji ljudi imaju svoje ja i suprotstavlaju se vodjama sranaka, rizikujuci pri tome karijere i zaposlenja, dok ljudske mizerije ostaju poslusni liderima, u ovom slucaju Bakiru Izetbegovicu. Svaki dan citamo nove podvale BiH rezimskih protiv Nezavisnog bloka. Za pametne, to je samo jos jedan razlog da podrzavaju Nezavisni blok. To je samo dokaz da su zaista nezavisni, da ih ne kontrolise velikosrpski projekat, kao sto je to slucaj sa SDA, SDP i DBB. M. B. ──────────── 4. Online Glasnik na Engleskom, No. 962 Povod je bio to sto je vijece Evrope (vjerovatno u dogovoru sa nasim kurvinim sinovima Bakirom i Covicem) trazilo od Parlamenta da se usvoji novi Izborni zakon i da se ugradi presuda Finci-Sejdic. Na to smo im mi napomenuli da imaju tri ravnopravne presude Suda u Strasbourg-u po pitanju ljudskih prava nekonstitutivnih naroda u BiH, i da oni dok nas opominju protiv diskriminacije Jevreja i Roma, jer ne mogu biti clanovi predsjdnistva, u isto vrijeme "zaboravljaju" presude Ilijaza Pilava i Azre Zornic, cime oni diskriminisu mnogo vise drugih gradjana BiH koji su pokriveni tim presudama. Buduci da imamo mnogo nasih mladjih ljudi koji govore Engleski, slijedi malo skraceno izdanje Glasnika na Engleskom. ──────────── ONLINE NEWSLETTER International, No. 962 January 28, 2018 CONTENT: 1. Council of Europe urges Bosnia to reform constitution, election law ahead of October vote 2. COUNCIL OF EUROPE DISCRIMINATES SOME BOSNIANS WHILE PREACHING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF SOME OTHER BOSNIANS ──────────── 1. Council of Europe urges Bosnia to reform constitution, election law ahead of October vote SARAJEVO, Jan 25 (SeeNews) -- The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) urged Bosnia to make progress in constitutional reforms and the reform of the election law before the general election in October . "All political stakeholders must shoulder their responsibilities and adopt the necessary changes both in the Constitution and in the Election Law at the latest six months before the next general election in October 2018," PACE declared in a resolution adopted on Wednesday. PACE remains concerned about the lack of progress in the field of constitutional reform and reform of the election law in Bosnia, which threatens the political stability of the country, it said. It pointed out that the 2014 elections were held for the second time under a legal and constitutional framework which is in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights since the 2009 judgment in the case of Sejdic and Finci: Once again, only Serbs, Croats and Bosniaks could run for the State Presidency or be elected/appointed to the State House of Peoples. The parliamentarians also stressed the urgent need to implement the Constitutional Court’s decision on the composition of the Federation's House of Peoples well ahead of the elections, as otherwise there is a serious risk that government formation both at Federation and at State level after these elections will be blocked. PACE noted its parliamentarians also regret that nationalistic and ethnic rhetoric still dominates the political discourse in the country. The text adopted by PACE indicates a series of recommendations to the authorities of Bosnia and Herzegovina to strengthen the democratic institutions, the rule of law and the protection of human rights. Bosnia and Herzegovina is made up of two entities, the Federation and the Republika Srpska The country joined the Council of Europe on April 24, 2002. ──────────── 2. COUNCIL OF EUROPE DISCRIMINATES SOME BOSNIANS WHILE PREACHING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF SOME OTHER BOSNIANS By Muhamed Borogovac, There are not one, but three different judgments against Bosnia-Herzegovina for violating own citizens' human rights from European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg. The mentioned Sejdic-Finci case, the Dr. Pilav case, and the Zornic case. We will explain them below, but note that by mentioning only the first and leaving out the other two, Council of Europe is actually giving a very wrong picture that would then imply the wrong or incomplete solution. Namely, Bosnian politicians only ever talk about Sejdic-Finci, because they believe that they can find a formula by which they can formally satisfy the Sejdic-Finci decision, yet keep the apartheid system that keeps Bosia perpetually disfunctional. But whn you take the complete picture of all three cases, all those plans fall apart. By ignoring the other two cases, European Council is actually assisting them in their intent. So that is very disturbing to Bosnians, that the European Council can supposedly fight against discrimination in Bosnia, but assist those who are discriminating against the citizens of Bosnia by only mentioning the Finci-Seidic judgment. Here are the three rulings by ECHR about discrimination against the citizens of Bosnia by the Bosnian ethnically based constitution: (1) Dr. Ilijaz Pilav v. Bosnia: Dr. Ilijaz Pilav sued because he was not allowed to run for the Presidency of Bosnia as a Bosniak living in the Republic of the Serbs (RS) entity. He argued his ethnicity should not disqualify him for running for office (of course!). Bosniaks and Croats from RS and Serbs from Federation should be able to run for Presidency and other offices at the state level. (2) Azra Zornic v. Bosnia: Azra Zornic declined to be affiliated with any of the ethnic groups. Because of that, she could not run for any office, anywhere. On behalf of tens of thousands of citizens of Bosnia like her who do not have an ethnic affiliation, she sued Bosnia because they should be able to run for any political office in Bosnia-Herzegovina without being forced to declare for one or another. As we know, Bosnia, during the Yugoslavian rule, was a melting pot of ethnic groups and cultures for decades. There are many people who feel only as citizens and patriots of Bosnia-Herzegovina. (3) Finci-Sejdic v. Bosnia: Finci and Sejdic, argued taht Jewish and Roma people (and other declared minorities) were unable to run for presidency of Bosnia. According to Dayton constitution only Serbs from the Republic of Serbs, and Bosniaks and Croats from the Bosniak-Croat Federation can run for Bosnian Presidencu. Bosnia lost all three cases, i.e. the Bosnian constitution was found to be in violation of the rights of Dr. Pilav, Ms. Zornic, Mr. Sejdic and Mr. Finci, and the countless Bosnian citizens who in some way share their situation. Therefore, there is an obligation for Bosnia to change the Bosnian constitution in a way that all three rulings of the European court will be implemented. Yet the politicians in power in Bosnia have made proposals that are subversive to the spirit of human rights and non-discrimination. Namely, they only focus on Sejdic-Finci and ignore the other two decisions, to propose just more ethnic offices (members of presidency, etc.) to represent certain minorities as groups. Many Bosnians argue against this, and say it is clearly impossible to satisfy all three rulings within the ethnic apartheid Dayton constitution, with its ethnic offices and ethnic territories. Only a non-ethnic non-apartheid constitution, based on rights of individual citizens regardless of their self-determination, can satisfy all three rulings. That dooms the Dayton constitution, which was intended to break the country along the ethnic lines, instead of creating a normal prosperous country that belongs to its citizens. Unfortunately, the enemies of Bosnia have much stronger voice in the media than Bosnians. and, as we can see, they are able even to reach The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.