Popis stanovnistva: Na djelu Alijina prevara zvana "dugi kora za kratki korak

ONLINE GLASNIK Nacionalnog kongresa Republike BiH - br. 685 31. juli 2010. SADRZAJ - CONTENT 1. Popis stanovnistva: Ponovo na djelu Alijina prevara zvana "dugi kora za kratki korak" 2. Na Muhamedovu zalost, sudija presudio protiv Krajisnikovog pomilovanja 3. Uredncki komentar Internet novina ──────────── ONLINE NEWSLETTER – International No. 684 1. Three victories of justice, three defeats of Serbia 2. World Court: Kosovo's independence was legal 3. Ex-Bosnian leader Ejup Ganic's UK extradition blocked 4. Momcilo Krajisnik denied early release 5. Appology to Ms. Azra Nuhefendic ──────────── Ovaj broj Glasnika se distribuira na 34,894 ispravnih adresa. ──────────── 1. Popis stanovnistva: Ponovo na djelu Alijina prevara zvana "dugi kora za kratki korak" Pise: Dr. Muhamed Borogovac Ljudi kazu: "Kada me prvi put prevaris, to ide na tvoj obraz. Kada me drugi put prevaris, to ide na moj." Nazalost, to pravilo ne vrijedi za Bosnjake. Njih mozes sto puta prevariti i to uvijek na isti nacin. Tipicna situacija je ovakva. Postoji neka institucija, zakon, neko pravno stanje naslijedjeno od Republike BiH koje je u interesu cjelovite Bosne i Hercegovine, a time i Bosnjaka, a ne odgovara razbijacima BiH, koji se sada pojavljuju u vidu "Republike srpske". "Bosnjacki" politicari pristaju da se o tome pregovara, ne osvrcuci se na cinjenicu da RS ne bi ni za zivu glavu pristala da se pregovara o nekom pravnom stanju koje je RS-u u interesu. U prvoj fazi dogovora postize se neki toboznji kompromis, gdje bosnjacki pregovaraci daju glavnu stvar, onu koja doticno pravno stanje karakterise kao povoljno za cjelovitu BiH, ali radi taktickih razloga zadrzavaju neku sitinicu u korist Bosnjaka na koju se mogu izvlaciti, ako bi ih neko optuzio da su na pregovorima dali bas sve Srbima. To je Alija ovako okarakterisao poslije Zenevskih pregovora iz 1995: "Poslije dugog koraka u losem pravcu, ovo je mali korak u dobrom pravcu." Za buduce reference nazovimo ovu vrstu porevare "dugi korak za kratki korak" po anlogiji sa "bad cop - good cop". Taj mali korak u dobrom pravcu je tu samo radi opreza, da se izdaja ne primjeti odmah. Medjutim, za koji mjesec dana dok se malo prasina slegne, Srbi pocinju da se bune, zbog onog malog koraka u dobrom pravcu i onda ponovo pocinju poregovori. Prosjecno inteligentni ljudi, kada bi se nasli na mjestu "bosnjacka" bi kazali: "Ne moze tako! Povlacimo i mi nase ustupke. Ne pristajemo vise na onaj dugi korak u losem pravcu. Sve se vraca na staro stanje, koje je nama ionako odgovaralo." Medjutim, posto su oni izdajnici, oni sjedaju da ponovo dogovaraju "kompromis" polazeci sad od toga da se podrazumjeva da je vec u dogovor uknjizen onaj dugi korak u losem pravcu. Evo kako taj model prevare izgleda na primejru pregovora o popisu stanovnistva. Bosnjaci su nedavno pristali da se izvrsi popis stanovnistva kojim ce se uknjiziti rezultati genocida i etnickog ciscenja. To je onaj dugacki korak u losem pravcu. I to su uradili po volji Dodika, mada Evropa to nije zahtijevala, nego je cak prvobitno predlagala da popis ne bude etnicki. Tim dugim korakom u losem pravcu ce Republika srpska biti i etnicki legalizovana, tj. i u etnickoj karti UN-a sada ce biti upisano da su Srebrenica, Visegrad, Banja Luka, Zvornik, Rogatica, Foca itd. vecinski srpski gradovi. Kao kratak korak u dobrom pravcu je bosnjacima ostavljeno da se i dalje formula za formiranje vlasti izvodi prema popisu od prije genocida 1991. A sada vidimo na djelu kako se priprema druga runda pregovora, u kojoj se ne devodi u pitanje dugi korak darovan Republci srpskoj, tj. pristanak na etnicki popis. Sada se ide dalje, da se eliminise i onaj minimalni ustupak Bosnjacima. A cetnici se mogu tako ponasati jer znaju da na drugoj strani imaju svoje ljude, Tihica, Silajdzica, Lagumdziju, da nista ne rizikuju, da sigurno dobijaju. Da kojim slucajem bosnjacki politicari nisu izdajnici, oni bi sada samo kazali: "Nema popisa, i dalje ostaje sve kako je bilo do sada. Znaci u etnickim kartama UN-a ostaje da je Srbrenica Bosnajcka, a i formula za vlast je prema popisu iz 1991, ako je to i sada." Medjutim, pogadjate, i ovi kao i svi raniji Izetbegovicevi, Silajdzcevi, Lagumdjijini, Tihicevi pregovori ce zavrsiti sa apsolutnim uspjehom cetnika. Vidjecemo kako ce se ponasati oni koji se sada uoci izbora ponovo busaju kako su za Republiku BiH, npr. SBiH i BPS, da li ce oni u Skupstini pokusati zaustaviti ovu najnoviju izdaju BiH. Dok god su cetnicki agenti na celu BiH, a oni su sada apsolutno ocistili vlast od sviju koji nisu u sluzbi cetnickog projekta, nema spasa za Bosnu i Hercegtovinu - uzalud svijet presudjuje u korist BiH, dariva nam skupocjene poklone, koje "nasi" polticari odmah namjerno razbiju cim ih dobiju u ruke. ──────────── 2. Na Muhamedovu zalost, sudija presudio protiv Krajisnikovog pomilovanja U Glasniku Br. 664 od 6.maja 2010 objavli smo clanak: 5. LAZNI "AKADEMIK" NA CETNICKOM PUTU. Tih dana je web portal "Depo" objavio da je Muhamed Filipovic podrzao Momcila Krajisnika u njegovom zahtjevu da ga pomiluju poslije samo 1/2 odlezane kazne, te je poslao Sudu pismo svoje podrske. Mi smo u tom broju Glasnika objavili Filipovicev odgovor portalu Depo na pitanje zasto je urgirao za Krajisnika, i zatim nas komentar na njegov odgovor. Epilog toga slucaja se dogodio ovih dana. Naime, 26. jula 2010 je Britanski sudija presudio da Krajisnikova molba za pomilovanjem bude odbijena "zbog tezine Krajisnikovih zlocina". Dakle, Krajisnik ostaje u zatvoru, suprotno zeljama "prominentnih Bosnjaka" tipa Muhameda Filopovica. Sjetimo se, Muhamed Filipovic je onaj "bosnjacki intelektualac" koji lansira teorije zavjera Zapada protv Bosne, navodno jer Zapad mrzi muslimane. Ovim je jos vise srozan Filipovicev kredibilitet, jer Zapad koji "mrzi muslimane" zadrzava Krajisnika u zatvoru, a on, Muhamed Filipovic trazi od britanskog sudije da pusti zlocinca?! Ako ste zainteresovani mozete vidjeti zakljucak presude u originalu na Engleskom u Internacionalnom izdanju Glasnika koje slijedi na kraju ove poruke, a cijelu presudu mozete naci na linku na kraju poruke. M. B. ──────────── 3. Urednicki komentar Internet novina Gospodin Borogovac cesto se oglašava po razno-raznim politickim pitanjima vezanim za Bosnu i Hercegovinu. Nemilosrdno i bez zazora proziva pokojnog Aliju Izetbegovica, žive Harisa Silajdžica, Sulejmana Tihica i Zlatka Lagumdžiju... Medutim, pada u oci cinjenica kako se nitko od, živih, prozvanih ne oglašava, ne odgovara na prozivke, ne polemizira sa komentatorom Borogovcem. U krajnjem slucaju ne moraju to ciniti radi sebe samih, ali bi morali zbog svih onih kojima je do cjelovite Bosne i Hercegovine stalo, zbog clanova svojih stranaka, simpatizera i biraca. Moguce je kako komentare dr. Borogovca ne uzimaju za ozbiljno, jer su objvaljeni na internet portalima, a možda i ne posjecuju web stranice. Ukoliko oni sve ono što Borogovac napiše smatraju nebitnim, sporednim i pucnjima u prazno, sasvim je sigurno da veliki broj istinskih Bosanaca i Hercegovaca, odanih domoljuba, ostaju zateceni svim tim šutnjama. Do drugih i drugacijih mišljenja sigurno im je itekako stalo. www.internovine.com Komentar: Postovani gosp. urednice Internet novina. Prate oni i te kako sta mi pisemo. A zasto ne odgovaraju na optuzbe, to je jednom je Sefer Halilovic lijepo okarakterisao kada je za Aliju Iztebegovica kazao:" Alija se brani sutnjom." Razlog sto se brane sutnjom je veoma jednostavan - jer znaju da mi govorimo istinu, a protiv istine nemaju pravu odbranu. Zato se oni poklope, i cekaju da se prasina na internetu slegne, a nepismeni svijet kojim oni manipulisu, njihova glasacka baza svakako nije na internetu. Dr. Muhamed Borogovac ──────────── Slijedi internacionalno izdanje Glasnika, Online Newsletter NCR B&H, No 684, za one koji razumiju Engleski. National Congress of the Republic of Bosnia-Herzegovina (NCR B&H) ONLINE NEWSLETTER – International No. 684 July 31, 2010 CONTENT 1. Three victories of justice, three defeats of Serbia 2. World Court: Kosovo's independence was legal 3. Ex-Bosnian leader Ejup Ganic's UK extradition blocked 4. Momcilo Krajisnik denied early release 5. Appology to Ms. Azra Nuhefendic ──────────── This issue is distributed to 34,894 Bosnian and 2,702 international readers. ──────────── 1. Three victories of justice, three defeats of Serbia By Muhamed Borogovac, NCR B&H The following are headlines copied from world media regarding 3 recent court decisions of 3 different western courts against Serbia: - World Court: Kosovo's independence was legal (AP) - Ex-Bosnian leader Ejup Ganic's UK extradition blocked (BBC) - Momcilo Krajisnik denied early release (ICTY) Those court decisions are very important in Bosnia for many reasons, but probably most important as a lesson. Bosnian leaders with the help of Serbian propagandists have created and promoted a conspiracy theory that world powers are responsible for the division of Bosnia because “the West hates Muslims”. In one version of that theory, Americans set in power Milosevic to do the dirty work for them. Therefore, the ideologues of the greater Serbia project are not responsible, nor their puppets among Bosnian politicians. Rather the Americans, British and other western powers are the real conspirators of ethnic partition and genocide. The majority of Bosnian people have been convinced of this theory, deflecting the blame away from Serbia’s agents in the Bosnian government, Izetbegovic, Silajdzic, Tihic, Lagumdzija etc. They accomplished this through control of the Bosnian mainstream media. Since 1992, when the world powers in the security council voted unanimously (and contrary to Serbia’s wishes) to recognize Bosnia as an independent state, Bosnian patriots have been trying to explain to the people that the alleged “hatred of Muslims” does not play a role in the decisions of international institutions. Yet it has been difficult to explain to a people living in a country where the powerful seem immune from the law, that international law is not similarly just a tool for powerful nations to help their friends, such as Serbia. The still ongoing process of dividing Bosnia began when Bosnian “Muslim” leaders, most prominently President Izetbegovic and Haris Silajdzic, did Serbia’s bidding in pushing for division in negotiations during the war. This was against the wishes of the people, but the politicians told the people that it was not their choice, that their “arms were twisted”. There was no arm twisting by western countries, but the “arm twisting” theory was so successfully placed that even some western lawyers believe it and still claim that Clinton, through Holbrooke, forced the then Bosnian president Izetbegovic to sign Dayton. The truth is that Clinton and Holbrooke did not have any means of forcing Izetbegovic to sign anything, because Bosnia was a victim of aggression. Izetbegovic's eagerness to agree with Serbia offered them an opportunity of a quick fix for the Bosnian crisis in Dayton, which was a political liability for Clinton, and they took that opportunity. Clinton and Holbrooke are not entirely without blame, as they protected Izetbegovic's secret, and they acted as facilitators in creating an ethnic apartheid in a state that was victim of aggression. They also never “outed” him, e.g. they never revealed Izetbegovic's true role. By their silence and political opportunism, they let the US take the blame among Bosnians for forcing division of the country, and in that sense, Clinton and Holbrooke put themselves before their country. We note that this all happened after the Bosnian army had decisively turned the tide of the war. According to the “west hates us” conspiracy theory the world is not ruled by law, but by the dictate of powerful politicians. The followers of that theory predicted that Serbia will win against Kosova, that Ganic will be extradited to Serbia that Krajisnik will be released. Those three court decisions in a short time caused that many former supporters of that theory to question it. For many intellectuals those events again exposed Bosnian leaders as traitors. The Bosniak leaders have not commented either of the court decisions; they must be keeping a low profile, waiting for the dust to settle down. Bosnian independent web site Depo.ba recently uncovered that a key Bosniak leader, Muhamed Filipovic, wrote a letter to the judge in the case of Mr. Krajisnik, in favor of his early release. When asked about it Filipovic admitted that it was the true. Muhamed Filipovic was introduced to Bosniaks in nineteen seventies as a Bosniak ethnic ideologue and even was the organizer of the unconstitutional Bosniak ethnic assembly, an unsuccessful attempt to get Bosniaks themselves to undermine the Bosnian state. Now Bosniaks can clearly see that the western judges, who supposedly “hate Bosniaks and Muslims” rule in favor of the Bosniak people and the Albanian people of Kosova, who are also majority Muslim. ──────────── 2. World Court: Kosovo's independence was legal The Associated Press 22 July 2010 World court rejects Serbian claim, says Kosovo's 2008 independence did not break int'l law THE HAGUE, Netherlands, July 22 (AP) -- The United Nations' highest court says Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia did not break international law. The nonbinding opinion sets the stage for a renewed push by Kosovo for further international recognition of its independence. Reading the opinion Thursday, International Court of Justice President Hisashi Owada said international law contains no "prohibition on declarations of independence." Kosovo sparked sharp debate worldwide when it seceded from Serbia in 2008, following a bloody 1998-99 war and nearly a decade of international administration. Kosovo's statehood has been recognized by 69 countries, including the United States and most European Union nations. Serbia and Russia lead a handful of others in staunchly condemning it. ──────────── 3. Ex-Bosnian leader Ejup Ganic's UK extradition blocked A British judge yesterday rejected a bid by Serbiato secure the extradition of former Bosnian leader Ejup Ganic on war crimes charges, saying the case was politically motivated. Ganic, 64, smiled and hugged his son and sobbing daughter as district judge Timothy Workman declared him free to return to his home country, five months after he was arrested at Heathrow airport as Serbia sought his extradition. “These proceedings are brought and are being used for political purposes and as such amount to an abuse of the process of this court,” Workman said in his judgment at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London. “I have concluded that there is no valid justification for commencing proceedings against Ganic”. The Serbian authorities, who had sought Ganic’s extradition on charges of ordering a series of atrocities in Sarajevo in May 1992, immediately announced plans to appeal the decision. During his judgment, Workman also told the court that no significant new evidence had emerged since two previous investigations, one of them by the UN war crimes court for the former Yugoslavia. Afterwards, Ganic and his family said they were heading home and would be inSarajevo by today. “Five months of my life I’ve spent here,” he told reporters outside the court. --- The whole article is on the link http://www.gulf-times.com/site/topics/article.asp?cu_no=2&item_no=376889&version=1&template_id=38&parent_id=20 ──────────── 4. Momcilo Krajisnik denied early release UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL Before: Judge Patrick Robinson, President Registrar: Mr. John Hocking Decision of: 26 July 2010 PROSECUTOR v. MOMCILO Krajisnik PUBLIC DECISION OF PRESIDENT ON EARLY RELEASE OF MOMCILO KRAJISIK Office of the Prosecutor Mr. Serge Brammertz Mr. Momcilo Krajisnik The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1. The International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations oflnternational Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 ("Tribunal") has been advised by the authorities of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ("United Kingdom") that Mr. Momcilo Krajisnik would be eligible on 2 April 2010 for consideration for release on parole licence under the United Kingdom's release arrangements, after having served one-half of his prison sentence. (...) F. Conclusion 33. While Mr. Krajisnik has displayed some evidence of rehabilitation, I am of the view that there remain significant factors that weigh against granting him early release. Mr. Krajisnik's crimes are of a very high gravity, involving a widespread displacement of the non-Serb population in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which caused great suffering. Moreover, in respect of the requirement that the President shall take into account the treatment of similarly-situated prisoners, the practice of the Tribunal is to consider the eligibility of a convicted person only after he has served two-thirds of his sentence; therefore, the fact that Mr.Krajisnik has only recently completed serving half of his sentence does not weigh in favour of his early release. (...) Dated this twenty-sixth day of July 2010 At The Hague The Netherlands Judge Patrick Robinson President [Seal of the Tribunal] 26 July 2010 ──────────── Remark: The ruling was too long for our Newsletter, therefore we quoted only the title and conclusion. The complete ruling is on the web site http://www.icty.org/x/cases/krajisnik/presdec/en/100726.pdf ──────────── 5. Appology to Ms. Azra Nuhefendic I apologize to Ms. Azra Nuhefendic for the mistake that I made in “Online newsletter No. 673”. In that newsletter I mistakenly understood one sentence in the article 3. Fabricating “Muslim terrorists” in Bosnia – examples from Italy, By Alda Radelli, Italian journalist. In that sentence Ms. Azra Nuhefendic was mentioned. I angrily drew a totally wrong conclusion that Ms. Nuhefendic is “assimilated Serb of Bosnian Muslim background, a typical kind of people that have power among Bosniaks in Bosnia”. The original newsletter included the complete article of Ms. Radelli, and I am hopeful that all the readers saw that my conclusion about Ms. Nuhefendic was wrong. Dr. Muhamed Borogovac